ONION TACOS
This Website / Blog belongs to Dora M. Dominguez-Carey 2005: Background Template: Dora's Diary 1; by Dora Dominguez Carey 2014: Dominguez Generations, Inc. 2005;

✔©✔

✔©✔

Friday, June 11, 2010

America: Get with the times already!

Get with the times my dear America, after all football is the most celebrated and the most popular game in the entire world. Yes, America, there is another game named football and it does not consist of our usual American-type football game requiring an 11 man roster on defense, offense and special teams. This world-wide game of football requires plenty of endurance, power, and the need for each player to be involved in all aspects of the game. Someone once said: “a football player (referring to the game coined as such in the United States) can play football but he cannot play soccer; however, a soccer player can play both sports with no problem”. True or not, I casually smirk as I think on that comment and am more apt to lean towards believing it than not.
Anyway, whether or not the USA –as a whole- ever tries to learn this great game of football -or stops calling it soccer which is doubtful but understandably so- and whether it ever embraces it as the rest of the world has is irrelevant in my story.
FIFA World Cup 2010 has arrived and its popularity keeps growing and shows no sign of slowing down or even diminishing. In ending I ask more Americans to support Team USA and give football (hmm, I meant soccer for you) a chance.

FIFA World Cup 2010: The Games Must Go On!

In South Bend Notre Dame wins one for the “The Gipper” (George Gipp), but in South Africa, Team Bafana Bafana wins one for Madiba.
As the world comes together to celebrate the beginning of FIFA World Cup 2010, there is so much pride and so much anticipation brewing through-out hallowed football walls everywhere.
My story involves the ups and downs of life and how it seems that any sporting event at some point or another is hit with what I call “the human factor”.

Such “human factor” reared its ugly head already in this event in the early hours of Friday morning near Johannesburg when a car accident took the life of Nelson Mandela’s 13 year-old great-granddaughter, Zenani Mandela (picture above). I am not sure about the circumstances surrounding it so I will not write about that. In few words which I hope contain some wisdom, great compassion, due respect, but certainly no apathy, what has happened has happened and that is all that I need to say about that.
In my own love of the game of football (soccer) and having been an avid follower for over 15 years, I was watching anything on t.v. which pertained to this 2010 World Cup. Early this week there was a bit of perplexity or ambiguity spread about regarding whether or not 91 year-old Nelson Mandela would show up for the opening game. After all, we all know what he did for his country back when they won their first-ever Rugby World Cup in 1995…Madiba himself was there – he was always there. Speculation would lean on the side that he would be at the opening game of the 2010 FIFA World Cup to see his beloved South Africa go head-to-head as the under-dogs versus Mexico. The Nelson Mandela Foundation (earlier this week) said he would be there, but one of his family members said “no”. Sad to say that fate would intervene and make that decision for him following the World Cup Opening Ceremonies in Johannesburg.
I am certain that it was with a heavy heart that Mr. Mandela watched the game from his own home. Torn apart as would be expected by his love of his country, the game and what he had just lost.

Note:
Bafana Bafana - It is a term of endearment which means "the boys the boys".

Madiba – This is the name of the clan of which Mr Mandela is a member. A clan name is much more important than a surname as it refers to the ancestor from which a person is descended. Madiba was the name of a Thembu chief who ruled in the Transkei in the 18th century. It is considered very polite to use someone’s clan name.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Pres. OBAMA: Hate Groups - Where Were Those Groups During the "W" Reign?!!

I posted the following data to my facebook wall tonight as a means to let people know how stupid, ignorant and dangerous ones actions and words can be. I am not sure how many of my FB friends will grasp the idea behind my posting, not sure I really care; but if they want to debate it, I welcome them with open arms. My goal really was to wake some people up - for them to see what their actions and words can lead to, that they should think twice about what they do and to be accountable for it. I also hope that maybe I can get some of my FB friends to delete their membership into any of these hate groups and to view things a little differently because things now really are no worse than when "W" reigned. Our economy started to collapse during his reign and got really bad by 2007, our freedom was attacked (9/11), our freedoms were truly dimished (Patriot Act). BUT immediately following a Republican reign over the White House and a Black, Democratic President having been overwhelmingly elected, it is only Pres. Obama whom gets treated like a commie, a thief, an illegal alien, a socialist. Please spare me, people. Anyway, below is what I posted, plus, I am including the web site (they speak of the groups who are wanting Pres. Obama to die) which I was referring to via a link (its URL): http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x272508

...i never, never, liked the previously 'selected' president "W", but i never wished for his death. bailouts occurred (started) during his reign, the 'patriot act' occurred under his reign, 9/11 occurred during his reign, big government was at its peak during his reign - not many good came out of his reign. hate groups, grassroots mov...ement groups were NOWHERE TO BE FOUND during his reign like now. even if a hate group existed during those grueling 8 years, no way would my consicence and morals allow me to join - they only incite hatred and violence. at most, i did join the "impeach g.w.bush group". i find groups like the one referred to via the link below and ppl who follow them quite sad and disappointing. we should be better than that. as if ppl like timothy mcveigh need anymore reason to do stupid things. BTW, Timmy did not bomb the Murrah bldg thus killing 168 innocent ppl for any cause, purpose or incident...he was just a scared, lonely, hate-filled narcissistic thug. besides, if part of his m.o. was that he was mad over the davidian incident at waco...well, timmy, let me remind you that david koresh was a child molester, a rapist and his group was stockpiling. militias like the armed forces still fall under fed law that the President is their Commander in Chief. (FYI...i fully support the right to bear arms). BTW, you seriously cannot hate the govt and love the military. the military is part of govt as are policemen, firemen, postal carriers. it is not the structure or our laws but some ppl (politicians, poli-pundits, and radicals) who make the govt bad, and we can make it good but not with violence. violence makes this a sad world to reside in, and if my post makes you indignant, don't read them anymore. it is my right to post, afterall, i am not inciting violence. be creative and post on your own wall - just don't throw stones - no one lives in glass houses, never did-never will.

Friday, April 16, 2010

TRUE DEFINITIONS: Present day, so-called Grass-roots Movement Groups

The true meaning of certain groups who believe that they are the only true Patriots yet some prove too cowardly to say what they really mean!
BIRTHERS: Radicals who hate anyone not of Aryan descent. Deep down, these people truly admired Hitler (who was a so-called Christian himself) and secretly wish to become his followers of late. These birthers would also love to go back pre-1968 when they truly ruled the U.S. This group is the one I mostly have a problem with and refuse to take them serious or to justify their anger and violent behavior with a duplicated attack - verbal or otherwise. They are ignorant and we are supposed to disregard those types.
TRUTHERS: Honestly, they just want the truth behind the 9/11 attacks. They would like to see “W” and his cronies in the administration at the time be held accountable for questionable actions leading up to the attacks and then to the start of a needless war against a sovereign nation all in the name of “payback”. Yeah, right, “payback” – call it what it really was – control over oil and wealth for those who aided the admin! “W” and his cronies all need a good, old-fashioned “whoop ass”. To the likes of one ignorant Sarah Palin, “W”, Cheney, and their supporters…“how’s all that oil working out for ya?”!!!
TEA PARTY MOVEMENT: Pissed off Americans who are tired of huge government bail-outs of corporate America; the bail-outs which began during the “W” reign but have been more readily scrutinized under President Obama. Taxation without representation…sure I understand that. At least members of the TP Movement have their basic rights. Ask the LGBT community how they fair during these hard economic times? Ask the LGBT community how they pay exorbitant amount of taxes just so that people involved with the TP can vote to deny them their rights. Marriage is supposedly sacred. Yeah, right, hardly so. Most LGBT couples in a relationship stay together longer, are more committed to one another, more committed to the family and more likely to heed the meaning of the word fidelity. LGBT couples do not share the same rights and privileges as members of the TP Movement. If your spouse becomes ill, you have the right to make life-changing/life-saving decisions for him/her, but an LGBT couple is chastised and thrown out of the room. They pay taxes for such crude and neanderthal-like treatments. TP Movement, I see your point but do you have to be so ignorant, radical, loud and violent in trying to get your point across?!! (rhetorical). Bottom line, the TP Movement is as racist as the birthers are and worse. The TP blames too many taxes, bail-outs and health care as the reason behind their cause when in actuality they are like the birthers who are pissed off at the fact of a Black man in the White House. Surely they remember times being worse during the "W" reign. The TP Movement automatically reverts to screams of bloody-murder ala socialism. They don’t want to share their wealth with the less fortunate. I understand that. No one asked them to completely and totally finance and support the poor, they are just being asked to act like the Christians they claim to be and lend a hand. I hate involving Christianity (I firmly believe in a true separation of church and state) but since the TP Movement claims it to be part of their foundation, I too shall go to that "place". Oh, and providing health care for over 35 million Americans just pisses off the TP Movement. Are they scared that for once in this country that everyone will have equal treatment on the health care scale. That the minorities, the low class, the no class, the poor, the tired will be on the same level as them and that the elimination of such scum will be minimized because fewer have to die from lack of medical attention and affordability? (rhetorical). Jesus would be for health care and He is probably totally disappointed and pissed off at such negative actions by these people. Did they learn nothing from biblical teachings to treat others fair and equal? (r) I do not wear my limited Christian beliefs on my sleeve, but I d0 know right from wrong, and therefore I do not get irate at lending a hand to those less fortunate especially when my own home has been so greatly rewarded. Some of the TP Movement members go around all indignant of so-called socialism with one hand making a fist and the other hand guarding their money. Reminiscent of a three year-old as he goes around not wanting to play fair nor to share his toys while all the time reciting the words…“MINE, MINE, MINE!”
My friend said it best the other day…
~Tea (Party) is bitter these days, I will take Coffee (Party) - it's much sweeter!~

Arizona: LULAC Finds New Immigration Law Unconstitutional

April 15, 2010

Contact: Lizette Jenness Olmos, (202) 833-6130 ext. 16

The law will lead to more racial profiling and discrimination.

Washington, DC – The League of United Latin American Citizens, the nation's oldest and largest Hispanic civil rights organization, will sue to block an Arizona immigration bill as unconstitutional should Gov. Jan Brewer sign it into law.
“We are horrified," said LULAC National President Rosa Rosales. "This law opens the doors to racial profiling. It requires police officers, if they form a 'reasonable suspicion' that someone is an illegal immigrant, to determine the person’s immigration status.”
LULAC is opposed to an existing program known as 287(g) allows local police to enforce federal immigration laws, contending that it has been ineffective and subject to abuse. LULAC has always opposed involving local police in immigration matters because they do not have the resources or training to enforce immigration law.
First Lady Michelle Obama in a trip to Mexico today stressed that immigration reform is necessary and that more Democrats and Republicans should support its enactment.
“We're seeing children who are trying to cross the border just to reconnect with their parents, and their family members and their lives are at risk,” said Rosales. “A strong immigration reform policy would help alleviate some of those challenges.”
Until Congress passes an immigration reform bill, states will continue to take matters into their own hands and communities and families will remain separated.
LULAC is the largest and older Hispanic Organization in the United States. LULAC advances the economic condition, educational attainment, political influence, health and civil rights of Hispanic Americans through community-based programs operating at more than 700 LULAC councils nationwide. For more information on LULAC, visit www.lulac.org.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Icon: Does Anyone Really Know What It Means Anymore?


First of all, thanks to Sara for including my quote (verbatim) on her "Tortillas Quemadas Blog" as I wrote it on my FB wall. I was so pissed off when the Academy left off Farrah as well in their Memorial Tribute to actors we lost in 2009. I clearly remember us asking one another...'did they leave out Farrah or did we not see her photo?'...'surely they (academy) would not leave her off, after all, they did include Michael'. Again, it was this AH of an entertainer who took the limelight away from our beloved Farrah. Enough of MJ tributes already. MJ should be of no importance here and the fact that he was remembered during the American Academy Awards (AAA: what an acronym) Memorial Tribute sans Farrah Fawcett just makes me livid.
MJ is "persona non grata" in my book. I have had a bad dislking of him dating back to 1995.  I grew up liking his music, but his character flaws (1993) ultimately proved too much for this one-time fan so I dismissed him as a musical artist in my book by 1995 especially after he started putting out awful music.  The main reason for my complete abadonment of MJ as one of my fav artisits was after his second accusation of child molestation and stint in court (2005). Jesus Juice is not my flavor of the day. Having been molested by a family member when I was a little girl does not leave me with any kind of sympathy for the likes of the Wacko-kid. "He loves kids too much"...that came from his own mouth in his ignorant and so not believeable attempt at justifying why he loved having kids (little boys) around him all the time. It may have been a reason I could accept until he admitted he slept with these little boys. Now what reason could any adult have for sleeping with little kids like that?!! (rhetorical)...I don't know any adult who would do such a thing. Not even in a family does one do that if the child in question is clearly not your son or daughter. You just do not do that, and it sickens me that MJ admitted to having done that with other people's kids and so many other people did not even think twice about it or worse yet, it did not sicken them enough to want to forget the likes of this guy...Michael, who much like Peter Pan, did not want to grow up. Just because a person of ill character dies does not warrant anyone pay him any kind of respect or tribute like thousands did for MJ when he died last June 2009.  I disliked him long ago and just because he died, it did not mean I was going to go against my own beliefs and ethics and pretend he was a person of good morals or feel any kind of sympathy for him.  Thousands of people had bad childhoods, MJ, but they never put other people's children in harms way, never abused them or never used them and then add it all up to not having had a childhood.  Hell, most children in this world never had or never will have childhoods.  Millions don't even have a home, millions have no parents, and every single day these millions of poor people suffer with not very much to eat if anything at all to eat.  What in the F--K made you so damned special, MJ? (rhetorical).  I stopped listening to his music long ago, even before I knew Sara in 1996, who some people may believe is the person who, in some weird, bewitching way had something to do with why I quit liking MJ.  Like I don't have a mind of my own.  People who know me should clearly know that I have free-thought and have never been afraid to say what I feel or how I feel, and that I am seldom influenced by what others think or say!   That I do my own research and reach a conclussion to all things in life all on my very own.  MJ died a long, long time ago dating back to the mid 90's for me. Yes, Siree, I feel a little perturbed that some people may think I quit liking MJ because of Sara. SO NOT TRUE! I stopped liking or following MJ long, long ago. I have never encouraged any of my nieces or nephews to listen to his music - certainly NOT after 1995.  I am sure if one asked any of them post 1995, they would all agree that I never played MJ music in their presence or advised them to listen to his music.  If I had kids of my own, I would NOT-NOT-NOT encourage them to listen to MJ much less to like him or to think this guy was ever a musical genius. Many have said that Hitler was a genius, but we do not regard him in the way people regard MJ now after he died. Matter of fact, it is a proven fact that many of the serial killers were of genius level, and we also do not consider them heros by any means. So why after MJ died did so many people forget every negative thing he did? I remember living the ordeals of MJ the first time he was publicly accused of child molestation (I backed him up and defended him that first time).  I also remember the second time which was the final breaking straw for this person, I could not go on defending him when my gut instinct said otherwise. In remembering everything so vividly and how it bothered me somewhat the first time MJ went to court and how it just made me want to throw up the second time he went to court to answer for those charges, it does not bode well with me that he was ever an innocent person. He was filthy rich and had it all yet he succombed to such hideous and negative ways of living his life. I remember seeing interviews with his family, mainly Janet, in which they all worried about him and his need to be around children. I remember they said they would often plea with MJ to stop having kids around him all the time. Janet even said it bothered her that he had such a need. I also remember his family saying they missed MJ and wondered why he chose to stay away from them and why, after he had those kids of his own, why MJ did not allow the kids to be around his family. It seems MJ had long ago kicked his family out of his life and when he died, his family acted like they loved each other so much and that they were all so close. That made my stomach turn as well. But, they have an excuse. After all, they are his family and sometimes family tends to turn a blind eye to a loved one even when said loved one has fallen short of being a good person or  law-abiding. The Jackson family now feels that they have to put up a front to appear like a "loving, true blue American family" in hopes that everyone forgets what their past family life was really like.  They have another good reason for trying to appear as a good family...MONEY.  And they seem to be able to rake in as much money now than when MJ was alive.  But, as people who were watching from the outside - not being blood related - why or how could so many people have forgotten how shady MJ's past was and how inappropriate his behavior was which lead to people accusing him of being a child molester!...(rhetorical)!  And Oh boy, I can hear how some will defend MJ and curse his accusers especially because some of his accusers took money from MJ.  It was indeed hush money and it may have been wrong for the accusers to take it, but how would we defend the action if money were waived around in our respective faces to remain "mum".  Many people already stay quiet during times of "alleged child molestation" when no money is being offered so why think it would be different if money was offered.  9 out of 10 people would take the money.  The person with the money and the fame is the one with all the power.  Personally, the offering of money by MJ to his accusers makes him look way more guilty.  Maybe MJ did not physically molest those kids, but sleeping with them makes him guilty in my book. It is just sickening to no avail when I think of that in itself. Like I said, having no kids myself puts me in a position of wanting to care for other's kids and making sure no harm comes their way. Having endured years of torment with what my uncle was doing to me when I was a child and no one was around to help me or to defend me and me being too scared to tell on him, I have no patience or empathy for the likes of one MJ. I was sad when he died. I mourned his songs; the original songs true to MJ himself dating back to his "Black and White" (1991) album. Any and all music post "Black and White" was IMO just awful and not worthy. I was also sad that this guy died the way he did. In the end, I personally do not blame his doctor(s), I blame him. How stupid are we in this society if we keep blaming everyone else for all the rotten things which happen to us instead of us accepting part blame or full blame. Blaming others is why this society is so screwed up and why we do not learn anything from previous mistakes. The only reason I felt bad for MJ was because he never had the opportunity to change and to live a decent life. To me, he will always be the entertainer who made music I loved in the late 70's, 80's and half way into the 90's. He will never be an icon in my book. He left behind such a blemished legacy that I can only remember that he was NEVER comfortable in his own skin, he had issues loving his family and he loved kids way, way, way too much for me to think it innocent. I remember MJ's trials w/no tribulations, and his court trials..."lest we forget"!  My gosh, I remember so much of the bad that it compeltely overpowers any of the good. Charles Manson paints good portraits, but because of what he did (or made others do in his name), I would not buy one of those pics and then hang it on my wall and call it art and then encourage my kids to follow the man or his art. I am not sure why so many people have chosen to forget what MJ really was. It disappoints me even more when I see people with kids who want their kids to be MJ fans and followers. I would never encourage my nieces and nephews to follow that guy (MJ) who had such a perverted guise anymore than I would tell them stories of that one uncle of mine who was very perverted himself and then try to paint a positive light when speaking of him. I would never allow that uncle the excuse of "loving kids too much". So, if I would not make such allowances for my own family (BTW: that uncle was not a blood relative of mine), why would I ever make excuses for a shady character like MJ whom is clearly someone that I never even met.  As a person (MJ) who was twice plagued by child molestation charges (and, yes, found innocent in court the second time but monies were exchanged for an out-of-court settlement the first time) but refused to do anything by which to reverse the negative image which he left behind for all to judge the actions, he made himself a huge target for future controversy and for people like myself to believe he had issues associated with children that normal people do not have.
In ending this story and posting it to blog, I will be brazen and bold enough to rightly state and reiterate that Michael Jackson is NOT an ICON.

Excerpt below is copied from an ABC online story written by JIM AVILA, CHRIS STRATHMANN and KATIE ESCHERICH, June 26, 2009:
Jackson twice faced serious allegations of child abuse, allegations he always strenuously denied. A multimillion dollar settlement was reached in the first case in 1993, and Jackson was found not guilty in a circus of a criminal trial in 2005. But that ordeal left him deeply in debt and under suspicion for the remaining years of his life. Many felt he had been convicted in the court of public opinion.